<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, it&#8217;s not as if I&#8217;m not slightly biased</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?feed=rss2&#038;p=523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523</link>
	<description>Contra naturam, now and forever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:16:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Davecat</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-4865</link>
		<dc:creator>Davecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-4865</guid>
		<description>Kat -
And really, the way you approach it is sane and sound. If you&#039;re presenting yourself in a subtle way that doesn&#039;t freak someone out, then you&#039;re doing it right. If that person is a genuine loner or introvert, they&#039;ll make their own (hopefully) informed decision about whether or not to interact with you, and if that person&#039;s just shy, you might well make a new friend.
The problem arises when extroverts force themselves and their personalities upon non-extroverts. They may not be doing it intentionally, but since extroverts by and large don&#039;t understand being any attitude apart from an &#039;in your face&#039; one, they don&#039;t get why they&#039;re rebuffed. Personally, I find it tiring dealing with people like that for extended periods -- and I mean physically and mentally tiring, as it requires a lot of energy to assert my presence so that I&#039;m on equal footing with them, as opposed to being pretty much suppressed by their boisterous and overactive attitude. If a person is sensible, they won&#039;t start out with everything cranked up to 11, they&#039;ll start out low, and work up to 11. Unless, of course, you&#039;re watching Spinal tap. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kat -<br />
And really, the way you approach it is sane and sound. If you&#8217;re presenting yourself in a subtle way that doesn&#8217;t freak someone out, then you&#8217;re doing it right. If that person is a genuine loner or introvert, they&#8217;ll make their own (hopefully) informed decision about whether or not to interact with you, and if that person&#8217;s just shy, you might well make a new friend.<br />
The problem arises when extroverts force themselves and their personalities upon non-extroverts. They may not be doing it intentionally, but since extroverts by and large don&#8217;t understand being any attitude apart from an &#8216;in your face&#8217; one, they don&#8217;t get why they&#8217;re rebuffed. Personally, I find it tiring dealing with people like that for extended periods &#8212; and I mean physically and mentally tiring, as it requires a lot of energy to assert my presence so that I&#8217;m on equal footing with them, as opposed to being pretty much suppressed by their boisterous and overactive attitude. If a person is sensible, they won&#8217;t start out with everything cranked up to 11, they&#8217;ll start out low, and work up to 11. Unless, of course, you&#8217;re watching Spinal tap. <img src='http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-4832</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-4832</guid>
		<description>I learned something too.  Maybe I distinguish introverts in a few ways.

1) Those that are completely happy with being alone and that have *chosen* to be a loner/introvert

2) Those that are introverts but have the desire to come out and play with everyone else.  Basically, these people are just too shy or awkward to be in a group setting (small or large groups, it depends on each individual).

When it comes to the latter, I know I have done what I can to show them that there is nothing to worry about.  They should just be who they are, no matter if they think that they wont be accepted.  I know I have danced away from my group (metaphorically speaking), approached a wall flower and asked them if they wanted to dance (not &quot;with me&quot; per se but if they wanted to dance near me).  If I gauge that they are more of a #1, than I leave them alone.

I just have to make sure I gauge well between #1 and #2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned something too.  Maybe I distinguish introverts in a few ways.</p>
<p>1) Those that are completely happy with being alone and that have *chosen* to be a loner/introvert</p>
<p>2) Those that are introverts but have the desire to come out and play with everyone else.  Basically, these people are just too shy or awkward to be in a group setting (small or large groups, it depends on each individual).</p>
<p>When it comes to the latter, I know I have done what I can to show them that there is nothing to worry about.  They should just be who they are, no matter if they think that they wont be accepted.  I know I have danced away from my group (metaphorically speaking), approached a wall flower and asked them if they wanted to dance (not &#8220;with me&#8221; per se but if they wanted to dance near me).  If I gauge that they are more of a #1, than I leave them alone.</p>
<p>I just have to make sure I gauge well between #1 and #2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davecat</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>Davecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ve certainly learned something.

I&#039;ll not say what it is out loud, but I&#039;ve learned something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve certainly learned something.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll not say what it is out loud, but I&#8217;ve learned something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doll Brother</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-2326</link>
		<dc:creator>Doll Brother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-2326</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on, people, for crying out loud!!!! this cosmo D story about the dolls is just exploitation and a conglomerate of several &quot;ideals&quot; involved with the real life D family and how their characters have been used repeatedly in pop culture for the past 61 years in America, not to mention being &quot;photographer&#039;s models&quot; for hundreds of dolls manufactured from 1959-1972!!!!  wake up America!!

Let&#039;s look of the age of the character- 27 years old;  introvert; boring job; has no girlfriend;  this character sounds a lot like the son of the photographer&#039;s model of the &quot;Patti Playpal Doll&quot; issued by Ideal Toy Company in 1959; that&#039;s why the character is obsessed with this doll because he knows it was made in his mother&#039;s image- even looks like his real life mother back in 1975 how coincidental; the real life story it is obviously based on is the fact that the son of this &quot;real life&quot; doll is obsessed with the fact that his mother, aka &quot;the image from which this doll originated&quot; in 1959 was exploited by a toy company when she was 2 years of age;  she received no reimbusement for this; sounds to me like the real life 27 year old son wants to the know the truth behind this little &quot;plastic hidden imam&quot;-

P.S.-  a lot of the members of this real life D family appear to be &quot;introverts&quot; because they don&#039;t be wanna be exploited by people out here in this world making films up about their lives, making songs up about their lives, etc.  in 1978, Father Philip Berrigan (another side kick to a real life doll named &quot;crissy&#039;) wrote a book about the D family plastic idolatry exploitation-  it was entitled &quot;Beastly Images And Essays On The Bomb,&quot; which told the story of how the only way this cosmo D pop culture exploitation in America (and the world) will end is with the dropping of a nuclear bomb thrown at America by America&#039;s enemy.

Let&#039;s look at some more- the Ideal Toy company (who manufactured this real life doll) was on the 79th floor of the WTC North Tower in 1970; terrorists (who disagree with plastic idolatry exploitation) flew it right into the building in 2001 to end that &quot;curse of a spirit&quot;  well put, I think-  hope you all learned plenty- read it over and over if you like- written by the Uncle of the Real life Lars-  thanks so much God bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on, people, for crying out loud!!!! this cosmo D story about the dolls is just exploitation and a conglomerate of several &#8220;ideals&#8221; involved with the real life D family and how their characters have been used repeatedly in pop culture for the past 61 years in America, not to mention being &#8220;photographer&#8217;s models&#8221; for hundreds of dolls manufactured from 1959-1972!!!!  wake up America!!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look of the age of the character- 27 years old;  introvert; boring job; has no girlfriend;  this character sounds a lot like the son of the photographer&#8217;s model of the &#8220;Patti Playpal <span class="ubernym uttJustLink" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', '99% of the time, whenever you see the word \'Doll\' here (note capital D), it\'s shorthand for \'life-sized artificial human\'. Or, as some would have it, \'high-end love doll\'','caption', 'Doll' );">Doll</span>&#8221; issued by Ideal Toy Company in 1959; that&#8217;s why the character is obsessed with this doll because he knows it was made in his mother&#8217;s image- even looks like his real life mother back in 1975 how coincidental; the real life story it is obviously based on is the fact that the son of this &#8220;real life&#8221; doll is obsessed with the fact that his mother, aka &#8220;the image from which this doll originated&#8221; in 1959 was exploited by a toy company when she was 2 years of age;  she received no reimbusement for this; sounds to me like the real life 27 year old son wants to the know the truth behind this little &#8220;plastic hidden imam&#8221;-</p>
<p>P.S.-  a lot of the members of this real life D family appear to be &#8220;introverts&#8221; because they don&#8217;t be wanna be exploited by people out here in this world making films up about their lives, making songs up about their lives, etc.  in 1978, Father Philip Berrigan (another side kick to a real life doll named &#8220;crissy&#8217;) wrote a book about the D family plastic idolatry exploitation-  it was entitled &#8220;Beastly Images And Essays On The Bomb,&#8221; which told the story of how the only way this cosmo D pop culture exploitation in America (and the world) will end is with the dropping of a nuclear bomb thrown at America by America&#8217;s enemy.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at some more- the Ideal Toy company (who manufactured this real life doll) was on the 79th floor of the WTC North Tower in 1970; terrorists (who disagree with plastic idolatry exploitation) flew it right into the building in 2001 to end that &#8220;curse of a spirit&#8221;  well put, I think-  hope you all learned plenty- read it over and over if you like- written by the Uncle of the Real life Lars-  thanks so much God bless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davecat</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>Davecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>Dr Goldfoot, Ph.D -
Holy crap. How have you been, sir? Apart from writing like a fiend? Everyone has a blog of some sort these days! Naturally I&#039;ll have to link you as well...

So you say &#039;Lars etc etc&#039; wasn&#039;t all that bad? Hm. I&#039;ll be sure to pass judgement on it when I catch it, which should be soon. But if you say it&#039;s got a sympathetic approach to Dolls and Doll ownership, then that&#039;s definitely a good sign... And it&#039;s like I always say (not really always, but still), it seems that people who are constantly railing against the concept of artificial companions are just showing off their own neuroses and closed-mindedness. Take poor unimaginative Cle, for example. 

Good hearing from you, man! Be sure to stop by now and again, as more Forum members than you&#039;d imagine pass through and leave the occasional comment! And Shi-chan says an enthusiastic Hi, and wants me to mention she still has those PVC booties that you and Jenny sold her. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Goldfoot, Ph.D -<br />
Holy crap. How have you been, sir? Apart from writing like a fiend? Everyone has a blog of some sort these days! Naturally I&#8217;ll have to link you as well&#8230;</p>
<p>So you say &#8216;Lars etc etc&#8217; wasn&#8217;t all that bad? Hm. I&#8217;ll be sure to pass judgement on it when I catch it, which should be soon. But if you say it&#8217;s got a sympathetic approach to Dolls and <span class="ubernym uttJustLink" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', '99% of the time, whenever you see the word \'Doll\' here (note capital D), it\'s shorthand for \'life-sized artificial human\'. Or, as some would have it, \'high-end love doll\'','caption', 'Doll' );">Doll</span> ownership, then that&#8217;s definitely a good sign&#8230; And it&#8217;s like I always say (not really always, but still), it seems that people who are constantly railing against the concept of artificial companions are just showing off their own neuroses and closed-mindedness. Take poor unimaginative Cle, for example. </p>
<p>Good hearing from you, man! Be sure to stop by now and again, as more Forum members than you&#8217;d imagine pass through and leave the occasional comment! And <span class="ubernym uttJustLink" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', 'aka Sidore, Sidore-chan, the Missus, etc. My ever-patient, always-beautiful Synthetik companion. A RealDoll made in July of 2000 - making her a Cancer - she\'s partial to Joy division, mecha-based videogames, and footrubs. She might also be narcoleptic (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kuroneko-chan.com&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;)','caption', 'Sidore (pronounced \'She-DOOR-ay\') Kuroneko' );">Shi-chan</span> says an enthusiastic Hi, and wants me to mention she still has those PVC booties that you and Jenny sold her. <img src='http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Goldfoot</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-2271</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Goldfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-2271</guid>
		<description>Hi Davecat,

Well, looks like everybody&#039;s got a blog these days! Today I found Stacy&#039;s, and from hers I found yours! 

My girlfriend &amp; I actually enjoyed &quot;Lars &amp; the Real Girl&quot; -- despite the ending, which went exactly according to formula. But I tend to think the people behind this film were on the doll-positive side, so this is a small step forward, not backward. The people around Lars had to examine their own prejudices, and a lot of them  (esp. women) came around to loving Bianca -- we already knew the guys would like her. 

One of my favorite lines: &quot;Does she have a sister?&quot; 

Take care, enjoy your new home!
Dr. G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Davecat,</p>
<p>Well, looks like everybody&#8217;s got a blog these days! Today I found Stacy&#8217;s, and from hers I found yours! </p>
<p>My girlfriend &amp; I actually enjoyed &#8220;Lars &amp; the Real Girl&#8221; &#8212; despite the ending, which went exactly according to formula. But I tend to think the people behind this film were on the doll-positive side, so this is a small step forward, not backward. The people around Lars had to examine their own prejudices, and a lot of them  (esp. women) came around to loving Bianca &#8212; we already knew the guys would like her. </p>
<p>One of my favorite lines: &#8220;Does she have a sister?&#8221; </p>
<p>Take care, enjoy your new home!<br />
Dr. G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davecat</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>Davecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>Wow. Who shat in your Cheerios this morning? Honestly, I&#039;d love to know, so I could applaud their work.

Originally I was going to simply delete your &#039;thoughts&#039;, but I figured, free speech and all that. Plus, people get exactly one shot at me, and that&#039;s it. Viva le comment approval!

Leaving out the needlessly petty comment about my &#039;tendency towards colorful but meaningless language&#039;, ultimately, what do you care if I have a relationship with a Doll? Personally, I&#039;d say &lt;i&gt;you&#039;re &lt;/i&gt;the unhappy one, as you&#039;re the one attacking me on my blog, about a lifestyle choice that does no harm whatsoever to you. Ever hear of the phrase &#039;If it harm none, do as thou wilt&#039;?

Anyway, thanks for writing! Sidore and I will be sure to give your comments the attention they deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Who shat in your Cheerios this morning? Honestly, I&#8217;d love to know, so I could applaud their work.</p>
<p>Originally I was going to simply delete your &#8216;thoughts&#8217;, but I figured, free speech and all that. Plus, people get exactly one shot at me, and that&#8217;s it. Viva le comment approval!</p>
<p>Leaving out the needlessly petty comment about my &#8216;tendency towards colorful but meaningless language&#8217;, ultimately, what do you care if I have a relationship with a <span class="ubernym uttJustLink" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', '99% of the time, whenever you see the word \'Doll\' here (note capital D), it\'s shorthand for \'life-sized artificial human\'. Or, as some would have it, \'high-end love doll\'','caption', 'Doll' );">Doll</span>? Personally, I&#8217;d say <i>you&#8217;re </i>the unhappy one, as you&#8217;re the one attacking me on my blog, about a lifestyle choice that does no harm whatsoever to you. Ever hear of the phrase &#8216;If it harm none, do as thou wilt&#8217;?</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for writing! <span class="ubernym uttJustLink" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', 'aka Sidore-chan, Shi-chan, the Missus, etc. My ever-patient, always-beautiful Synthetik companion. A RealDoll made in July of 2000 - making her a Cancer - she\'s partial to Joy division, mecha-based videogames, and footrubs. She might also be narcoleptic (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kuroneko-chan.com&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;)','caption', 'Sidore (pronounced \'She-DOOR-ay\') Kuroneko' );">Sidore</span> and I will be sure to give your comments the attention they deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cle</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-2266</link>
		<dc:creator>Cle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-2266</guid>
		<description>&quot;love can take many forms — just because someone’s partner is artificial doesn’t make the partnership less valid&quot;

Yes it does.  A partnership is a relationship between two consenting persons, usually towards some common goal or according to a contract.  A doll is not a person, cannot consent, doesn&#039;t have any goals.  You can&#039;t form a partnership with an inanimate object, or an animal or anything like that.  To say you have a partnership with a doll is just to misuse language (judging by phrases like &quot;vibrating neurosis&quot; you obviously have a tendency towards colorful but meaningless language).  You&#039;re trying to use the sort of argument used for gay marriage, but it simply doesn&#039;t work.

There&#039;s nothing wrong with having a doll, but don&#039;t kid yourself about what&#039;s going on.  It&#039;s not a partnership.  It&#039;s you and a possession.

&quot;2) Society has a vibrating neurosis about people being happy introverts. Extroverts seem to believe that the only good experiences are shared amongst the company of others, which is patently false. Granted, it’s obvious that a person can have fun with others, just not all the time. They don’t understand that not everyone is a go-gettin’ Type-A personality — some people happen to like it quiet and calm. Extroverts are particularly nosey, and seem to be almost offended when introverts want to keep to themselves. ‘How can he be happy if he’s inside all the time by himself?’ Sure, there are people who actually want to reach out and just don’t know how to go about it, but there are others who have done that, didn’t particularly like what they saw, and decided to stick with what they know.&quot;

You&#039;re not wrong in general.  Extroverts do have a hard time understanding introverts.  But I question how happy *you* actually are.  You don&#039;t seem very happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;love can take many forms — just because someone’s partner is artificial doesn’t make the partnership less valid&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes it does.  A partnership is a relationship between two consenting persons, usually towards some common goal or according to a contract.  A doll is not a person, cannot consent, doesn&#8217;t have any goals.  You can&#8217;t form a partnership with an inanimate object, or an animal or anything like that.  To say you have a partnership with a doll is just to misuse language (judging by phrases like &#8220;vibrating neurosis&#8221; you obviously have a tendency towards colorful but meaningless language).  You&#8217;re trying to use the sort of argument used for gay marriage, but it simply doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with having a doll, but don&#8217;t kid yourself about what&#8217;s going on.  It&#8217;s not a partnership.  It&#8217;s you and a possession.</p>
<p>&#8220;2) Society has a vibrating neurosis about people being happy introverts. Extroverts seem to believe that the only good experiences are shared amongst the company of others, which is patently false. Granted, it’s obvious that a person can have fun with others, just not all the time. They don’t understand that not everyone is a go-gettin’ Type-A personality — some people happen to like it quiet and calm. Extroverts are particularly nosey, and seem to be almost offended when introverts want to keep to themselves. ‘How can he be happy if he’s inside all the time by himself?’ Sure, there are people who actually want to reach out and just don’t know how to go about it, but there are others who have done that, didn’t particularly like what they saw, and decided to stick with what they know.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not wrong in general.  Extroverts do have a hard time understanding introverts.  But I question how happy *you* actually are.  You don&#8217;t seem very happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davecat</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-1962</link>
		<dc:creator>Davecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-1962</guid>
		<description>Hey JF -
Think of it this way: once you become a realtor, you&#039;ll be able to buy a number of Dolls! Unless the market&#039;s shite, of course. Better pick up a Doll with your first available commission, then. :-)

&lt;i&gt;&#039;I think when a person uses another to satiate their social need and nothing more, that’s just as reprehensible as how society views someone who uses a doll as a sexual outlet.&#039;&lt;/i&gt;
Hear, hear. Moreso, even. A lot of societal meetings can be reduced to &#039;networking&#039; -- outside of using Person A to meet Persons B, C, and D, you wouldn&#039;t be speaking to them in the first place, and that&#039;s absolutely shameful. At least with being in a relationship with a Doll, you&#039;re not bothering anyone else, or taking advantage of them.

Obviously, I don&#039;t need to convince you, as you&#039;ve pretty much echoed (pun) what I&#039;ve been saying for years. So start raking in the $$$, and get yourself &lt;s&gt;a Doll&lt;/s&gt; some freedom. At the very least, run it by your wife! She might enjoy the idea!...

Thanks for weighing in, and do drop in again, if you so desire!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JF -<br />
Think of it this way: once you become a realtor, you&#8217;ll be able to buy a number of Dolls! Unless the market&#8217;s shite, of course. Better pick up a <span class="ubernym uttJustLink" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', '99% of the time, whenever you see the word \'Doll\' here (note capital D), it\'s shorthand for \'life-sized artificial human\'. Or, as some would have it, \'high-end love doll\'','caption', 'Doll' );">Doll</span> with your first available commission, then. <img src='http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><i>&#8216;I think when a person uses another to satiate their social need and nothing more, that’s just as reprehensible as how society views someone who uses a doll as a sexual outlet.&#8217;</i><br />
Hear, hear. Moreso, even. A lot of societal meetings can be reduced to &#8216;networking&#8217; &#8212; outside of using Person A to meet Persons B, C, and D, you wouldn&#8217;t be speaking to them in the first place, and that&#8217;s absolutely shameful. At least with being in a relationship with a <span class="ubernym uttJustLink" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', '99% of the time, whenever you see the word \'Doll\' here (note capital D), it\'s shorthand for \'life-sized artificial human\'. Or, as some would have it, \'high-end love doll\'','caption', 'Doll' );">Doll</span>, you&#8217;re not bothering anyone else, or taking advantage of them.</p>
<p>Obviously, I don&#8217;t need to convince you, as you&#8217;ve pretty much echoed (pun) what I&#8217;ve been saying for years. So start raking in the $$$, and get yourself <s>a <span class="ubernym uttJustLink" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', '99% of the time, whenever you see the word \'Doll\' here (note capital D), it\'s shorthand for \'life-sized artificial human\'. Or, as some would have it, \'high-end love doll\'','caption', 'Doll' );">Doll</span></s> some freedom. At the very least, run it by your wife! She might enjoy the idea!&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for weighing in, and do drop in again, if you so desire!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523&#038;cpage=1#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>JF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/?p=523#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>I agree. Nowadays, I&#039;d rather have a Realdoll than a real woman and I seriously mean that. I&#039;m married with two wonderful sons but if I ever got divorced there&#039;s no way I&#039;d go on the dating circuit. It just isn&#039;t worth it. What? Go out and waste time, energy and money on someone who, if you get together and eventually marry, you&#039;re 70% likely to divorce them.

I&#039;m becoming a realtor soon and once I get a foothold in the industry and make some money I don&#039;t want some whiny woman who didn&#039;t do anything to earn my money asking for half of it after things go sour.

I&#039;m much like John Wayne in that respect, I suppose, because I HATE being in social situations for the point of being in social situations. I had lots of friends in school and in the U.S. Navy but if I don&#039;t have to be social, I don&#039;t. I have my close family and a handful of friends that are still on the East Coast that I talk to occasionally but that&#039;s it. 

My wife is the social type and makes friends with people and, with every single &#039;friend&#039; she ends up complaining to me how horrible they are. I think when a person uses another to satiate their social need and nothing more, that&#039;s just as reprehensible as how society views someone who uses a doll as a sexual outlet. If I could ever afford a Realdoll I&#039;d get one. Hell, they never age, you get to pick what they look like, they don&#039;t bitch and whine, they can&#039;t run around on you and spend your money. I&#039;m sold. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Nowadays, I&#8217;d rather have a Realdoll than a real woman and I seriously mean that. I&#8217;m married with two wonderful sons but if I ever got divorced there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;d go on the dating circuit. It just isn&#8217;t worth it. What? Go out and waste time, energy and money on someone who, if you get together and eventually marry, you&#8217;re 70% likely to divorce them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m becoming a realtor soon and once I get a foothold in the industry and make some money I don&#8217;t want some whiny woman who didn&#8217;t do anything to earn my money asking for half of it after things go sour.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m much like John Wayne in that respect, I suppose, because I HATE being in social situations for the point of being in social situations. I had lots of friends in school and in the U.S. Navy but if I don&#8217;t have to be social, I don&#8217;t. I have my close family and a handful of friends that are still on the East Coast that I talk to occasionally but that&#8217;s it. </p>
<p>My wife is the social type and makes friends with people and, with every single &#8216;friend&#8217; she ends up complaining to me how horrible they are. I think when a person uses another to satiate their social need and nothing more, that&#8217;s just as reprehensible as how society views someone who uses a doll as a sexual outlet. If I could ever afford a Realdoll I&#8217;d get one. Hell, they never age, you get to pick what they look like, they don&#8217;t bitch and whine, they can&#8217;t run around on you and spend your money. I&#8217;m sold. <img src='http://www.kuroneko-chan.com/echoes/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
